It's the thirteenth of the month, which means it's time for my grandfather's classic joke. He's always so proud of this one:
"This month, Friday the thirteenth came on Saturday!" He's always incredulous, or at least he pretends to be.
Just smile and nod, folks.
I'm going to stop telling people the story of yelling at my father in the middle of the Skyline in Blue Ash. (I apologize to the staff and patrons, and I understand if I am kindly asked not to dine there in the future.) But, basically, I keep getting blank stares from my audience whenever I get to the point of the story wherein I scream at my father that feelings have nothing to do with love. Apparently, that's not a very widely held opinion nowadays, even among my eighty-year-old grandparents.
But stick with me for a second. If you're married, go back and read your wedding vows, and if you're not, I'm sure you know basically what the typical, stock vows say. Yeah, there's that bit about "to love and to cherish, to have and to hold." But even that isn't really about how a person feels at any given moment. By definition, in taking a vow, you are making "a solemn promise, pledge, or commitment," according to dictionary.com. Furthermore, the second definition clarifies that a vow is "a solemn promise made to a deity or saint committing oneself to an act, service, or condition" (emphasis added). The third definition adds a public dynamic to a vow, "a solemn or earnest declaration" (emphasis added). Therefore, we learn several important things about the nature of taking a vow from these explanations. A vow is not something to be taken lightly, and it carries a great deal of weight and implies the intent of the person taking the vow to carry through with the promise or commitment he is making. Especially in the case of Christian weddings, the idea of a vow as a covenant between God and the vow-taker takes on monumental importance. Wedding vows are not promises made to another person, that person about to become one's spouse. They are promises between a person and God in regards to another person. It's a lot harder and, I would argue, a lot more serious to break a promise to God than to a person, even if that person is your spouse. And third, we learn that vows are made in public, and for what reason? I can think of a few. He who vows may be excited to tell the world of his decision, or he may be proud to have convinced his beautiful bride-to-be that he is "the one."
Or, maybe, the reason that such a solemn promise is made between the speaker and God, but in public and with one's family and closest friends present, is to add a degree of accountability. Most, if not all, of the people important in the lives of the bride and groom are present to witness the ceremony. The promises made by both sides are no secret, and there are many witnesses. Therefore, if one of the parties decides to back out on those vows, do not those who care about the person in question most have a right to speak up and remind the vow-taker of his promise?
Besides "to love and to cherish, to have and to hold," most participants in the typical Christian wedding utter such juxtapositions as "in sickness and in health" and "for richer, for poorer." No matter how many wrinkles appear on the face of one's aging spouse or how many trips to the hospital drain the joint bank account, those vows stand. And then, those most solemn words pave the way for the "I do"s to come: "'til death do us part." That's not "until something better comes along" or "until my feelings change" or "until my spouse is horribly disfigured in an accident." That is until death.
My parents, like many couples, read a famous passage from 1 Corinthians 13. You know the one: "Love is patient, love is kind," etc. Love does some interesting things in that passage. Love "always perserveres." Furthermore, "Love never fails."
"Always" and "never" are big words.
Therefore, in my view, once someone is married, his feelings fall to the wayside. The heart-fluttering, pulse-quickening feeling that may have caused the couple to realize that they are "in love" invariably deepens to a less exciting but more committed love. Love is a commitment, a decision. It is not a feeling. And the fact that one's feelings are changing is not a reason to move on to something better, but rather to recognize the changing stages of one's relationship.
So, no. I'm not just going to dismiss it lightly and "get over it" and "move on with my life" when you throw away something that I see as so sacred and so binding a promise. I don't support the decisions you've made, so why should I be expected to accept your lifestyle? I don't.
I've entertained your arguments and your ideas; they don't stand up to my scrutiny.
Recent Comments